Elon Musk’s vision behind DOGE—using bold, efficiency-driven strategies to trim excess and waste—holds an appealing promise. In theory, reducing inefficiencies and streamlining operations can lead to leaner companies and a more agile government. However, the execution has often veered into a destructive “slash-and-burn” methodology that risks undermining long-term stability.
A Vision Marred by Destruction
At his private companies, Musk has repeatedly demonstrated an aggressive style. His drastic cost-cutting moves at Twitter—now rebranded as X—involved firing thousands of employees, discontinuing legacy systems, and auctioning off office essentials. While these actions may cut costs on paper, they’ve also fostered chaotic environments, compromised innovation, and hurt brand reputation.
When the Stakes Are Higher: Government Versus Corporate Efficiency
The stakes are even higher in the public sector. The government, by design, exists to serve its people and is held to a higher standard of accountability and transparency. Musk’s approach, when translated to his role in government efficiency initiatives (often dubbed DOGE), includes mass layoffs, unilateral decisions, and rapid dismantling of longstanding programs. This “slash-and-burn” tactic may save money in the short term, but it risks disrupting critical public services—from healthcare to social security—where stability and trust are paramount.
The Cost of an Inflated Ego
Many critics argue that Musk’s methods are driven by an inflated ego and an overconfidence in his ability to reshape complex institutions overnight. Instead of carefully evaluating which processes can be reformed, his approach often bulldozes through systems without fully considering the human and societal costs. Whether in cutting jobs at tech companies or dismantling federal agencies, the consequences can be far-reaching—impacting not just the bottom line but also the lives of millions.
A Call for Responsible Reforms
The idea of eliminating waste is not inherently flawed. In fact, efficiency is essential both in business and government. Yet, the means to achieve it must be thoughtful and measured. Rather than a sweeping, destructive purge, reform should be a collaborative process that considers long-term impacts, preserves core functions, and safeguards the rights and well-being of employees and citizens alike.
Fighting Back Through Accountability
Increasingly, people and institutions are beginning to push back. Boycotts of Musk’s companies and protests against government policies serve as reminders that efficiency should not come at the expense of accountability or human dignity. When the government—a body representing the people—adopts methods reminiscent of a corporate fire sale, it not only endangers public services but also erodes trust in democratic institutions.
Ultimately, while the underlying concept behind DOGE—to create leaner, more effective systems—is undeniably attractive, the execution falls far short. True efficiency demands a balanced approach, one that marries cost-cutting with empathy and accountability, ensuring that the vital services supporting everyday life remain intact.
